<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>encyclops &#187; star trek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://encyclops.com/archives/tag/star-trek/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://encyclops.com</link>
	<description>books, movies, music, tv, video games, comics, &#38; overheard conversations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 02:46:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>star trek</title>
		<link>http://encyclops.com/archives/75</link>
		<comments>http://encyclops.com/archives/75#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 06:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>encyclops</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[star trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://encyclops.com/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s really good. I enjoyed it a lot. It&#8217;s not great. I don&#8217;t think any single movie (with the possible and obvious exception of The Wrath of Khan) or episode (with the possible and obvious exception of the Next Generation episode &#8220;The Inner Light&#8221;) has been great on its own. What makes Star Trek is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really good. I enjoyed it a lot.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not <em>great</em>. I don&#8217;t think any single movie (with the possible and obvious exception of The Wrath of Khan) or episode (with the possible and obvious exception of the Next Generation episode &#8220;The Inner Light&#8221;) has been great on its own. What makes Star Trek is the continuity &#8212; the emotional investment we make in the starship &#8220;family&#8221; and their approach to the universe. I say &#8220;we,&#8221; but while I&#8217;ve seen all the movies, most if not all of the Next Generation episodes (which were airing when I was growing up), and a smattering of DS9, Voyager, and the original series (and the pilot of Enterprise), I&#8217;ve never really been a Trekkie.</p>
<p>This movie won&#8217;t completely change that, though I&#8217;ll admit that for the first time since maybe Wrath of Khan I came out of a Star Trek movie eager for a sequel. It&#8217;s not because the plot was great; it was actually pretty awful, a wacky time-travel mess that didn&#8217;t even make sense while I was watching it, much less afterward. It was a clever way to deal with continuity, to give the reimagining a &#8220;science&#8221;-fiction justification rather than just running with it unexplained, but it didn&#8217;t really stand up to scrutiny. But then neither did most of the other things we saw, such as a bunch of cadets (or at least barely-graduated Starfleet students) being thrown onto bridge positions aboard actual starships, an experienced captain who wrote a thesis on a disaster whose twin he later fails to recognize (so that Kirk can figure it out and explain it to him), a mysterious substance that detonates to form a singularity but can be transported in glass tubes, random sentient aliens on the run from either George Lucas or Guillermo del Toro, and a big confrontation between Spock and Kirk that I won&#8217;t spoil but which isn&#8217;t at all&#8230;logical.</p>
<p>However, luckily, J.J. Abrams has built this thing around what really matters in Star Trek: affability and optimism. The crew are terrifically cast and all fun to watch &#8212; Uhura, Spock, Kirk, Chekov, Sulu, and Scotty &#8212; and several of them are actually pretty sexy, something I never thought I&#8217;d say about those particular characters (for the record: Uhura, Kirk, and Chekov). This is a Trek that gets downright slapstick a lot of the time, just silly and manic, and it actually works. This in itself is quite an accomplishment.  But the crew are also all energetic, can-do youngsters &#8212; intellectual achievers, lateral thinkers, terrific athletes, and highly original geniuses.</p>
<p>It sounds nauseating, doesn&#8217;t it? But it&#8217;s not, and even if it&#8217;s utopian fantasy, it&#8217;s one I&#8217;d actually want to live in, or at least live up to. This, as I understand it, was what Gene Roddenberry was aiming for, and I&#8217;m gratified to finally have gotten a glimpse of what Trekkies everywhere love so much about their fictional home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://encyclops.com/archives/75/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

